Eintime Conversion for education and research 05-14-2006 @
17:22:16 Copyrighted by originating associated source: Original |
Oil Doesn't Want Focus on Big
Profit
Companies Stepping Up Advertising
By Frank Ahrens
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 26, 2005; D01
Gigantic oil companies generally do not enjoy the best PR.
Pick your poison: Oil companies have caused tanker spills, proposed drilling
into the Arctic wildlife ranges, crafted ties to shady nations and meddled
in the affairs of others, and produced products that pollute.
Now, even as high gasoline prices continue to anger motorists and aggravate
financial problems at General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co., the
oil companies have begun to report record quarterly profit. Yesterday, British
energy giant BP PLC reported a $6.53 billion third-quarter profit, up from
$4.87 billion in the same period last year. And tomorrow, analysts expect
Exxon Mobil Corp. to show that it earned nearly $9 billion over the past
three months -- the largest corporate quarterly profit ever.
Grumbling already has begun on Capitol Hill: Last month, one senator proposed
a windfall-profit tax on oil conglomerates, and yesterday, House Republicans
warned energy companies against price gouging.
To deflect the damage, the energy industry is relying on an ad campaign that
was escalating even before hurricanes Katrina and Rita blitzed Gulf Coast
petroleum refineries. The print and television ads are designed to educate
consumers and lawmakers with a "we're all in this together" tone.
In the pages of The Washington Post, for example, according to the paper's
ad executives, BP has taken out seven large issue ads so far this year, compared
with zero through the same time last year. Exxon Mobil has had 19 so far
this year, compared with 12 last year. For Chevron Corp., it's 17 ads so
far this year, compared with six last year. And the industry's trade group,
the American Petroleum Institute, has purchased seven ads in The Post so
far this year, compared with none last year.
Chevron and Exxon Mobil increased their ad spending in the third quarter
of this year at the New York Times, the newspaper company reported in its
earnings call last week.
"You still have 100 hours of press time on any oil spill versus a tiny blurb
or nothing at all if a company spends hundreds of millions on pollution control,"
said Lyle Brinker, an analyst for the John S. Herold Inc. energy research
firm. "Sometimes, they just throw up their hands. The best thing they can
do is keep the debate focused on educating the public."
Red Cavaney, president of the American Petroleum Institute, said the ads
partially are designed to correct no-longer-true misperceptions about his
industry. For instance, he said, even though 90 percent of the Gulf Coast
drilling platforms and refineries were hit by either Katrina or Rita, there
were no oil spills.
The industry's ads range from simple conservation messages to those that
attempt to re-brand the oil companies as something else.
An American Petroleum Institute ad implores consumers to turn down thermostats,
clean furnace filters, and weatherstrip windows and doors.
Full-page ads from Chevron ominously warn: "It took us 125 years to use the
first trillion barrels of oil. We'll use the next trillion in 30."
The most conspicuously non-oil oil ads come from the former British Petroleum,
which removed the oil from its name and became BP. Now, the company advertises
itself as "Beyond Petroleum." The company's logo resembles a sun with leaves.
Stumble onto a BP television ad and it is easy to assume it is a commercial
for a company that makes solar panels. Or that BP is an environmental
organization of some sort.
"Solar is but a tiny, tiny, tiny part of their business," Brinker said. "They
make 99.9 percent of their money in the oil business."
But oil companies may have nowhere to hide as their third-quarter earnings
roll in this week.
"They should be record earnings," said Jacques Rousseau, an oil analyst at
Friedman Billings Ramsey Group Inc. in Arlington.
In the third quarter of 2004, for instance, Exxon Mobil earned $6.2 billion.
When the company reports its third-quarter results tomorrow, David Dropsey,
an analyst with Thomson First Call research, expects profit of about $8.8
billion.
Chevron made $3.2 billion in last year's third quarter; Dropsey predicts
the company will hit about $4.3 billion for this year's third quarter.
ConocoPhillips Co. is expecting a $3.5 billion quarterly profit when it reports
today, Dropsey said, up from $2 billion last year.
"Yes, our numbers are large, but when you figure the size of the companies,
we are at an all-industry average," Cavaney said. "We are half the size of
the returns of the financials and pharmaceuticals."
Yesterday, House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) called it "fine" that
energy companies are reaping record profit. "However, there have been allegations
of price gouging in the wake of the hurricanes. This is unacceptable, and
any company who does it will be prosecuted," he said.
Cavaney said industry research showed that most consumers and lawmakers do
not fully grasp how the energy industry works and why prices go up and down
at the pumps. (He pointed out that average gas prices are back within 10
cents of their pre-Katrina level.)
This led his organization and many of the big oil companies to step up their
hearts-and-minds media campaign. This is partially to help educate the consumers,
but also to try to dissuade lawmakers from reinstituting a windfall-profit
tax -- the last one stretched from 1980 to 1987 -- which oil companies fear.
They say the tax drives up gasoline prices by reducing crude supply.
Last month, Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.) introduced a bill that would establish
a windfall-profit tax on energy companies that would return some of the
companies' earnings to consumers in the form of a rebate, exempting the
percentage of profit the companies use for exploration.
Oil price hikes and corporate profit spikes are caused by supply and demand,
Cavaney said. And the annual 5 to 10 percent decrease in the world's oil
supply, combined with government resistance to allow drilling in places such
as Alaska's wildlife refuge and the emergence of China as a major oil user
has tipped the needle to the demand side of the equation, he said. The oil
company ads seek to explain the complicated energy industry math to consumers,
Cavaney said.
"We started back in the year 2000, trying to warn people that we were in
a position that increases in demand were exceeding capacity," but no one
listened, Cavaney said. "What we took too much for granted was that people
understood our business."
(Original Len: 7405 Condensed Len: 7352)
Created by Eintime:CondenseHtmlFile on 060514
@ 17:22:16 CMD=RAGSALL
(Len=7519)