Eintime Conversion for education and research 10-14-2009 @ 19:48:54 Copyrighted by originating associated source: Original |
The worst of all worlds
Globalization will not disappear with protectionism ¡X it will just turn ugly
By Joseph S. Nye
Monday, Apr 13, 2009, Page 9
The world economy will shrink this year for the first time since 1945, and some economists worry that the current crisis could spell the beginning of the end of globalization. Hard economic times are correlated with protectionism as each country blames others and protects its domestic jobs. In the 1930s, such ¡§beggar-thy-neighbor¡¨ policies worsened the situation. Unless political leaders resist such responses, the past could become the future.
Ironically, however, such a grim prospect would not mean the end of
globalization, defined as the increase in worldwide networks of
interdependence. Globalization has several dimensions, and though
economists all too often portray it and the world economy as being one and
the same, other forms of globalization also have significant effects ¡X
not all of them controlled ¡X on our daily lives.
The oldest form of globalization is environmental. For example, the first
smallpox epidemic was recorded in Egypt in 1350BC. It reached China in 49AD,
Europe after 700, the Americas in 1520, and Australia in l789. Bubonic plague,
or the Black Death, originated in Asia, but its spread killed a quarter to
a third of Europe¡¦s population in the 14th century.
Europeans carried diseases to the Americas in the 15th and 16th centuries
that destroyed up to 95 percent of the indigenous population. In 1918, a
flu pandemic caused by a bird virus killed some 40 million people around
the world, far more than World War I. Some scientists today predict a repeat
of an avian flu pandemic.
Since 1973, 30 previously unknown infectious diseases have emerged,
and other familiar diseases have spread geographically in new, drug-resistant
forms. In the 20 years after HIV/AIDS was identified in the 1980s
it killed 20 million people and infected another 40 million around the world.
Some experts project that this number will double by 2010. The spread of
foreign species of flora and fauna to new areas has wiped out native species,
and may result in economic losses of several hundred billion dollars per
year.
Global climate change will affect the lives of people everywhere. Thousands
of scientists from more than 100 countries recently reported that there is
new and strong evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50
years is attributable to human activities, and that average global temperatures
in the 21st century are projected to increase between 1ºC and 5ºC.
The result could be more severe variations in climate, with too much water
in some regions and not enough in others.
The effects will include stronger storms, hurricanes and floods, deeper droughts
and more landslides. Rising temperatures have lengthened the freeze-free
season in many regions, and glaciers are melting. The rate at which the sea
level rose in the last century was 10 times faster than the average rate
over the last three millennia.
Then there is military globalization, consisting of networks of interdependence
in which force, or the threat of force, is employed. The world wars of the
20th century are a case in point. The prior era of economic globalization
reached its peak in 1914, and was set back by the world wars. But, while
global economic integration did not regain its 1914 level until half a century
later, military globalization grew as economic globalization shrank.
During the Cold War, the global strategic interdependence between the US
and the Soviet Union was acute and well recognized. Not only did it produce
world-straddling alliances, but either side could have used intercontinental
missiles to destroy the other within 30 minutes.
This was distinctive not because it was totally new, but because the scale
and speed of the potential conflict arising from military interdependence
were so enormous. Today, al-Qaeda and other transnational actors have formed
global networks of operatives, challenging conventional approaches to national
defense through what has been called ¡§asymmetrical
warfare.¡¨
Finally, social globalization consists in the spread of peoples, cultures,
images and ideas. Migration is a concrete example. In the 19th century, some
80 million people crossed oceans to new homes ¡X far more than in the
20th century. At the beginning of the 21st century, 32 million US residents
(11.5 percent of the population) were foreign-born. In addition, some 30
million visitors (students, businesspeople, tourists) enter the country each
year.
Ideas are an equally important aspect of social globalization. Technology
makes physical mobility easier, but local political reactions against immigrants
had been growing even before the current economic crisis.
The danger today is that shortsighted protectionist reactions to the economic
crisis could help to choke off the economic globalization that has spread
growth and raised hundreds of millions of people out of poverty over the
past half century. But protectionism will not curb the other forms of
globalization.
Modern technology means that pathogens travel more easily than in earlier
periods. Easy travel plus hard economic times means that immigration rates
may accelerate to the point where social friction exceeds general economic
benefit. Similarly, hard economic times may worsen relations among governments,
as well as domestic conflicts that can lead to violence.
At the same time, transnational terrorists will continue to benefit from
modern information technology such as the Internet. And, while depressed
economic activity may slow somewhat the rate of greenhouse gas build-up in
the atmosphere, it will also slow the types of costly programs that governments
must enact to address emissions that have already occurred.
So, unless governments cooperate to stimulate their economies and resist
protectionism, the world may find that the current economic crisis does not
mean the end of globalization, but only the end of the good kind, leaving
us with the worst of all worlds.
Joseph S. Nye is a professor at Harvard University and was recently rated
as one of the most influential scholars of the past 20 years by scholars
of international relations.COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Copyright © 1999-2009 The Taipei Times.
(Original Len: 6711 Condensed Len: 7172)
Top
Created by RagsRefs.bas\Eintime:CondenseHtmlFile
CMD:REFSNEW DEBUG
10-14-2009 @ 19:48:54
(Len=7419)