Life Sentences For Crimes Against Life On
Earth
CO2 sinning
constitutes a crime against life on earth. All are guilty who generate CO2.
The level or category of one's guilt is based on one's actions, that
is, lifestyle and employment.
-
Lifestyle
-
The vegetarian, cave dwelling sins less than materialist who has an unnecessarily
oversized house with numerous gas-guzzling vehicles.
-
The parent who hikes with their children compared to the parent who jets
to distant sports events, e.g., skiing, golf or Olympics.
-
Employment
-
A janitor in an elementary school versus an executive of an oil company.
-
A farmer versus the crew chief of a NASCAR team or a head coach of a perrennial
NCAA-ranked team.
Gene Pool Draining
: The punishment should
fit the crime. Crimes against life on earth should intersect with the
primary moral
imperative of saving life on earth. The number one problem is that there
are too many people on the face of the earth. Please note that in the matter
of saving life on earth, the main thing is to depopulate as quickly as possible
to a sustainable level of population that can focus on life-saving actions.
Within the context of
controlled
depopulation and enforced euthanasia, who and whose family should die
first? The least or the most guilty?
CheerLosers
: Important to assessing an individual's CO2 sin is the impact of
encouraging others to sin. It is like the difference between a person who
incites peace and one who incites riots. A sports coach is a cheerloser,
not a leader. He teaches the
play pathos, not
the work ethic.
Related Issues:
-
Shared Blame and Punishment:
-
Trump Card of Primary Moral
Imperative
-
Datamining
-
GOOHF: Get Out Of Hell Free
Quality Control Tools for Higher
iCube ...
Frog Leaping.
'Links To': Pages linked to by this page:
(
(IndexDir ...
Refs General ... !RefsRvu ... !Dir.nts) InfoLinks
(05-22-2015@07:28)
IndexAD1.bas:LinkLstToTable
|
Link Label on this page |
Uploaded |
Webpage Title of Link file |
|
(A)
No Incomplete Links:
|
|
(B)
HTTP:// Links:
|
| > |
#1 Twit16.jpg> |
ext=LSE |
http:\\www.twitter.com\Brainbeesclass=twitter-follow-buttondata-show-count=false |
|
(C)
No Dated Links:
Annotated References: HTB
|
|
(D)
No Templates:
|
|
(E)
No Internal Links, Absolute (non-dated):
|
|
(F)
Internal Links, Relative (non-dated and ignore lifehour credit links):
|
| > |
#1 primary moral imperative |
Upload 080527 |
Primary Moral Imperative |
| > |
#2 controlled depopulation |
100825 |
Controlled Depopulation: Why and How (Armada Letter) |
| > |
#3 play pathos |
100823 |
Play Pathos Is Not The Work Ethics |
| > |
#4 work ethic |
101205 |
Work Index |
| > |
#5 Shared Blame and Punishment |
100823 |
Shared Blame and Punishment for CO2 Sinning |
| > |
#6 Trump Card |
101018 |
Trump Card of the Primary Moral Imperative |
| > |
#7 GOOHF |
110712 |
GOOHF Index |
|
(G)
No Current Directory Links
|
Created by Linkstat.bas\Program
CMD:G: BBS
05-22-2015 @ 07:32:33
(Len=10k)
: The punishment should
fit the crime. Crimes against life on earth should intersect with the
primary moral
imperative of saving life on earth. The number one problem is that there
are too many people on the face of the earth. Please note that in the matter
of saving life on earth, the main thing is to depopulate as quickly as possible
to a sustainable level of population that can focus on life-saving actions.
Within the context of
controlled
depopulation and enforced euthanasia, who and whose family should die
first? The least or the most guilty?